"Ten Lies The Church Tells Women" ~ J. Lee Grady. How come that if your husband kills you, it will be to the glory of God? Really? I see No God in this, and maybe that's the point!


TEN LIES THE CHURCH (and all other patriarchal religions too) TELLS WOMEN

by J. Lee Grady (source*)
All "blue" quote inside this article is my own words, as a personal comment!

We live in the 21st century, but if we're honest we have to admit that in some ways the church is still in the Dark Ages -- especially when we look at the way we treat women. Even though the Scriptures never portray women as secondary to men (when it comes to the Bible - a description of the creation of woman from the man's rib has been added at the time of the Babylonian Captivity, when the Talmud was created and when Judaism adapted to their religion basis of the Code of Hammurabi - B.S.), our male-dominated religious system still promotes (and even more in islam - which is preparing by the patriarchs of West to replace the outdated and not satisfying more of their needs, Judeo-Christianity - B.S.)  a warped view of female inferiority. Women are tired of this, and as a man, so am I -- because such demeaning attitudes don't reflect God's heart.

Jesus challenged gender prejudice at its core when He directed so much of His ministry toward women.  In a Middle Eastern culture that considered women mere property, He healed women, discipled them and commissioned them to minister (and in this sense - as compared to other solar gods, born from goddess-virgin, Jesus seems to be the best way to educate the male part of the population, but we must remember that Jesus was created as an idea by a group of mystical and esoteric (like Essenes) and Gnostic - first believers - who, in any country were in the minority. Meanwhile, the priests-men (the elders) always had the deciding vote and that's why their view of the nature of Universum is completely different. Their ideal is power, domination rather than equality of all people regardless of gender or race - B.S.).  Yet today we spend much of our energy denying them opportunities -- and using the Bible (or Talmud, Torah, or Koran) to defend our prohibitions.

I've identified 10 erroneous views about women that for too long have been circulated in the church, preached from pulpits and written in the study notes of popular Bible translations. I believe we must debunk these lies if we want to see the church fully released to fulfill the Great Commission.


How sad that so many Christian men view women from a selfish perspective.  This view is often promoted by misreading the account of Eve's creation in Genesis 2:18-25, in which Adam is provided a "helpmate." The Hebrew word used here often is translated "companion," denoting intimacy and partnership. But through the centuries it has been used to imply that Eve was some type of domestic appendage

We men have assumed that God gave Eve to fulfill Adam's sexual needs as well as to serve as his cook, laundress and maid.  But the Genesis account does not say this. 

After Eve's creation, God did not tell her: "You are Adam's helper; I command you to serve him well."   She was not created for servitude; she was fashioned to be a co-laborer with Adam so that they might rule together over creation as God commissioned them to do (see Gen. 1:28). 

Hindu Goddess Aditi
Greek Goddess Demeter (Ceres) - the Goddess of Harvest
Roman Goddess Hestia
Her cult began existence - of the Order of priestesses,
Holy Confession
and burning votive candles
Gnostic Sophia Tree - by ancient Israelis called the Shechinah, in later Christian gnosis called - Sofia = Divine Wisdom, then the third person of the Holy Trinity, also reminiscences of the Black Madonna (formerly Mary of Magdala), which was converted later by patriarchal priests to impersonal Spirit Casper as he is now known.


From the time she was released from a German death camp in 1944 (700 years after death of Cathars from Languedoc, also year when my father was born - B.S.) until her death in 1983 (another nice year - in which I was born - B.S.), Corrie Ten Boom* taught the world about a Savior who could forgive the cruelest Nazi. Yet she never married.  Did the fact that she did not have a husband make her less "complete"?  Some Christians would say yes. 

We have spent so much energy defending the concept of the biblical family that we are guilty of idolizing it. We've preached that a woman's primary responsibility is to find a godly husband, have lots of babies and stay home to raise them for Christ. [For thousands of years women have protected the matriarchal order of the world, extolling the Great Goddess, her love, mercy, tolerance, understanding for all living and sentient beings. Who says that a woman is only an addition to a male-ruler and without him is not able to create great spirituality - is an idiot and has nothing to do with any merciful God! Only evil-person can creates such a division! - B.S.].

But marital status is not a qualifier for ministry. The Bible does not even state whether certain key followers of Jesus, such as the 12 disciples, were married or not (despite the fact that these 12 Apostles is only 12 Babylonian constellation (= signs of the zodiac) - B.S.).
The highest calling of all believers -- married or unmarried -- is to develop a relationship with Jesus.  Any other earthly relationship is secondary, and Christ Himself warned us never to allow people we love to become idols that distract us from Him. 

Goddess Isis (= matriarchal Ishtar, Astarte, Inanna)

Egyptian Goddess Hathor = Greek Mother Goddess Hera

Goddess Bastet (- Egyptian equivalent of the Mesopotamian Goddess Inanna from the Matriarchal times)

LIE #3.  WOMEN SHOULDN'T WORK OUTSIDE THE HOME (= warrant which refers to the covert approach prohibition of exercise of power by women!)

Many evangelical churches have preached that women who work outside the home are breaking a scriptural commandment, but this conclusion can be reached only by distorting the biblical record. The woman described in Proverbs 31 is often used to bolster a traditional view of the June Cleaver - style matron who spends her day baking casseroles while her husband is at the office.  But a careful reading reveals that the Proverbs 31 woman, in her ancient Middle Eastern context, functioned as a real estate agent and ran a textile business.

Titus 2:5 instructs women to "take care of their homes" but most scholars would agree that this passage simply exhorts married women not to forsake their children. [Today we know that working women or women occupying important positions in politics, do not have to give up of being a mother. Who is forcing them to do opposite? That men - who because of their maternity stands on their way into a career - B.S.].

It is true that - indeed, because of ambition or materialism, some Christian women neglect their children even though the Holy Spirit (? as above) has urged them to put their career objectives on hold. But rather than placing a legalistic burden on women by telling them that having a career is ungodly, we should tell both men and women to submit their career plans to the Holy Spirit's direction.  [The system in which we live was created by men and for men. It's time to create a new system that will be based on understanding and respect of both sexes - as equals. - B.S.].

Illustration: David L. Clemons for "SpiritLed Woman."

LIE #4.  WOMEN MUST OBEDIENTLY SUBMIT TO THEIR HUSBANDS IN ALL SITUATIONS (= it is especially visible in the extreme radical part of all monotheisms, both: Christianity, Judaism and Islam and even in Brahmanism and Buddhism)

A distraught Christian woman who was regularly beaten by her husband finally gained the courage to seek counsel from her pastor. After she told him about her husband's fits of rage, the pastor responded, "If your husband kills you, it will be to the glory of God."o_O [the same also teaches the Catholic Church - as well as other religions. Breaking the sacred marriage out of the question, it is a sin, in islam (sharia law) a man can divorce a woman with several witnesses just saying aloud that he does not want her. But the woman for the same, may die! - B.S.].

The pastor reached this irresponsible conclusion because of a distorted view of "male headship." We often portray marriage as a hierarchy, with husbands on the throne and wives at the footstool, and we use Scripture to justify this view: "Wives...submit to your husbands as you do to the Lord" (Eph. 5:22).

We assume this verse means women have no say in family matters or that their opinion is second-rate.  In extreme cases, women have been told to submit to abuse in order to honor male headship.  But this is not a Christian view! [- very well said, Lee, cuz Christianity as we know it, is not the gnostic original version from early centuries, but the mixed cult of patriarchal supremacy, which includes elements of Babylonian, Egyptian and Middle East worship of the Sun God. New - drafted in IV c. A.D. - Testament was written entirely by the Roman aristocratic family of Piso, who legalized in this way their power for the next 2,000 years, giving the divine - as once in Babylonia and Egypt - power to kings and male priests, and pushing women into the darkness of the Middle Ages, because previously they destroyed reigning for thousands of years the matriarchal world and have blood on their hands of many priestesses - B.S.]

Paul also told the Ephesians, "submit to one another" (5:21, emphasis added).  I have heard teachings by male clergy on the subject of male headship, but I've never heard a pastor encourage men to submit to their wives! Yet in a loving marriage, a man and woman will defer to one another as they make decisions. It should be like that for sure!

In my 16 years of marriage, my wife and I have had plenty of disagreements. But when we reach an impasse, I don't announce (like in islam, for example), "I am the head of this house, so what I say goes."   Rather, Deborah and I either agree to pray about the matter, or we choose to defer to one another.  The point is never who is in charge.  I view my wife as an equal, I am not "over her."   We function as one.  :)

LIE #5.  A MAN NEEDS TO "COVER" A WOMAN IN HER MINISTRY ACTIVITIES (= another example of how Western Christianity is similar - despite appearances - to Islam)

This idea came from a distorted interpretation of the apostle Paul's words, in 1 Corinthians 11:3, "the head of woman is man" (NKJV).  People have used these words to bolster the idea that women are subservient to men or that they cannot approach God without a male authority figure in their lives. 

Paul's teaching in 1 Corinthians 11 about head coverings is a difficult passage, and Bible scholars don't agree on its meaning.  However, most teach that Paul is addressing specific cultural concerns in first-century Corinth and that he is calling for propriety and order in a society where immorality and paganism had blurred gender distinctions.  Paul was not placing men in a position of generic rulership over women.  Because there is "no male or female in Christ" (see Gal. 3:28), women can pray, worship, study the Bible or minister without a man present.  How silly and twisted is to think that a man, because of his gender, could add credibility to prayer or Spirit-empowered ministry! To believe this would be to trust in the flesh. 


Search your concordance.  Scripture never describes men as "priests of the home." This man-made concept was popularized in evangelical churches in the last century (just as the Catholic Church thinks, but these reevaluation they borrowed from the Roman goddess Hestia, created a male Orders - B.S.).  Christians - as they say - have allegedly - one priest, Jesus. It is a mockery of the gospel to suggest that any human being needs an additional priest apart from the Jesus.

The Bible says all believers are priests (see 1 Pet. 2:9, Rev. 1:6); there is no gender restriction by the way. Husbands function as priests when they pray for their families or when they minister the Word of God to them, and wives also function in this role. 

My experience in marriage has been that God speaks both to me and to my wife.  He doesn't say to me, "Since you are the head of this house, I'll tell you my plans for your family, and you can tell the others what I said."   Often God has revealed His plans to my wife before I heard anything!

Christian men need to stop being defensive and recognize that God has called us to function in unity with our wives [Cuz that is the semitic point of view created in dark ages in Babylon - B.S.]. We need to listen to their counsel, consider their opinions, and pray together rather than putting our foot down and shouting, "I am the leader of this family, and what I say goes!".

Many different versions of the same matriarchal cult (the Goddess Mother and Child) from around the world, from different eras.
Mother Goddess and Child in Gypsy
The Holy Family in India (birth the Patriarchate)
The Holy Family from Ancient Egypt
The Holy Family from Middle East


The most common mistake we make in biblical interpretation occurs when we take one isolated verse and build a doctrine around it -- even if the verse seems to contradict other passages. This is often what we do with 1 Tim. 2:12, "I do not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man" (NASB). [so do, since St. Ambrose, Augustine and Thomas, all the priests of European Christianity, teaching eg. That "the woman is a dirty bag of filthiness" - B.S.].

Most theologians believe that this passage was addressing an isolated situation in Ephesus. They came to this conclusion after studying the myriad of references in the Bible to women in spiritual authority. The Old Testament records that Deborah was a judge over Israel -- and God blessed her leadership in battle (see Judg. 4-5). Other women who held authority over men include Miriam, Huldah and Noadiah. 

Jesus issued His first gospel commission to women (see Matt. 28:1-10), and both men and women were empowered to preach on the day of Pentecost (Acts 2:1-4). Priscilla, Chloe and Phoebe were leaders in the early church, and one woman, Junia, is called an apostle by Paul (Rom. 16:7). [But when the same in the thirteenth century Cathars from the Languedoc taught, the Roman Catholic Church murdered them all - B.S.].

The promise of the prophet Joel was that "sons and daughters" would prophesy after the Holy Spirit was given to the church (Joel 2:28, emphasis added). Yet we have taken one misunderstood verse from Paul's writings and used it to negate hundreds of other passages that support the full release of women into ministry.

Eastern Goddess Cybele
Cybele and Attis
Death of Attis
Aphrodite mourning Adonis
Pieta by Michelangelo (in Vatican)


Since 1 Timothy 2:12 obviously contradicts the overall biblical endorsement of women in authority, how are we to understand it? What is Paul actually saying in this passage?

In their book I Suffer Not a Woman, Richard and Catherine Clark Kroeger explain that certain cultic worship practices involving female priestesses of Diana had invaded the first-century church.  These priestesses promoted blasphemous ideas about sex and spirituality, and they sometimes performed rituals in which they pronounced curses on men and declared female superiority. [which is extremely funny, considering that, Modern Christianity bases its dogmas on the ancient myth of the Goddess, mourning her Son, and at the same time a lover (Inanna - Dumuzi, triad Isis - Osiris - Horus, Cybele - Attis, Aphrodite - Adonis, Artemis - Actaeon, czy Mary - Jesus), so who really who has imposed to whom - his supremacy? - B.S.].

What Paul was most likely saying to the Ephesians was this: "I do not allow a woman to teach these cultic heresies, nor do I allow them to usurp authority from men by performing pagan rituals."  He was not saying, as some Christians have assumed, "I do not allow godly Christian women to teach the Bible."   In his day, Paul would have been thrilled to have had more skilled women who could teach the truth!

This idea has been taught by twisting the meaning of 1 Timothy 2:14, which says, "It was not Adam who was deceived, but the woman being quite deceived, fell into transgression" (NLT).  Some have suggested that because Eve was tricked by the devil, women have a stronger propensity toward deception.  Others have gone so far as to insist that women are to blame for all the evil in the world and are therefore under a greater curse than men. [Considering that 1) the holy books of patriarchy invented men, 2) all of these texts are derived from the Code of Hammurabi 3) and that most of the wars, violence and injustice in this world has always done and are doing even now, men - just look at the muslim world - obvious seems to be - hypocrisy of such statements and their perfidious desirability, isn't? - B.S.].

No respectable Bible scholar in the church today would promote such a view (but They do actually - B.S.). The Bible clearly states that Adam and Eve were both held guilty by God for their disobedience, and they were both punished (as the first Christians said in gnostic gospels, for seeking the Wisdom!, nice God, as Hell! - B.S.).  In 1 Timothy, Paul cited the creation account not to place extra blame on Eve but to refute a bizarre teaching that was circulating in Asia Minor. 

In the first century, Gnostic were mixing Christianity with old wisdom.  One of their teachings stated that Eve actually liberated the world when she disobeyed God and gained secret knowledge from the snake (= ancient symbol of Wisdom, snakes were in Matriarchy the important symbol of the gift of clairvoyance, many priestesses used them to see the future, like Pythia or Sybil - B.S.)

Paul was not teaching that women are more prone to deception.  He was explaining that what Eve did was not right (for patriarchal priests Lol), and that the Christian view of the creation was that Adam and Eve sinned when they listened to the serpent.  Interesting, isn't?

Women are certainly capable of spreading deception because they have a fallen nature as men do - cuz we are equal!, but there is no evidence that they have greater gullibility than men. That view is rooted in demeaning stereotypes and prejudice. 


Once I was listening to Bible teacher Cindy Jacobs speak at a prayer conference in Colorado. When she approached the pulpit, two men who were sitting in front of me turned to each other and began to pray softly. 

"Lord, we bind the power of the devil from bewitching this audience," one man said, adding, "We bind the power of Jezebel in the name of Jesus."   These men believed that the crowd would automatically come under a spirit of deception when Jacobs taught them -- simply because she was a woman. 

How absurd! Was Barak "deceived" when he took orders from Deborah? (See Judg. 4:14.) Did baby Jesus come under a harmful influence when Anna prophesied over Him? (See Luke 2:36-38.) Was Apollos spiritually emasculated when he submitted to the teaching of Priscilla? (See Acts 18:26.) Of course not!

To associate godly women with Jezebel, a wicked Old Testament despot, is unfair and offensive, yet men in the church today often pin Jezebel's label on strong, anointed women because they feel threatened by them. 

Let's stop the insults.  If a woman is using manipulation to usurp authority or if she is spreading heresies, then she certainly deserves the Jezebel label -- as do men who do such things.  But women who walk in spiritual integrity and preach the word of God with power deserve our respect. [but the point is that patriarchal religions (all known today) are not a creation of the good God, or any god but only an effective instrument of power for a small group of priests, kings and other rulers to rule the world through the millennia. Another reason for their oppression - social inequality, lies, corruption and wars - is to defend - safeguard Us from the true enlightenment, defend human access to true spirituality, cutting off all of Us from our roots. They talk about themselves as the servants of Good, but for thousands of years formed divisions, one god supposedly manifested in various fighting with other religions, and everything in order to control the flow of positive energy, so the mankind couldn't reach the truth, couldn't grow spiritually and intellectually. Is that fair? Is that sounds good to you? Their words are twisted, fed to us by the ideals in which they themselves do not believe or do not practice, hence so often discrepancies between what is written in their texts and how they act and what they say, because they all trust only in the Code of Hammurabi. All the rest sacred texts are fake, created only for Us as the fairy tales. Just as They are not our Defenders but our Guards. Deal with it and then you'll see the truth! - B.S.].

At the end I would like to add from myself intriguing quote I found recently:  “Women make up one half of society. Our society will remain backward and in chains unless its women are liberated, enlightened and educated.”  !!!!! - I couldn't believe at first that these words said: Saddam Hussein, but later... not because I am a fan of ,dictators', these words lead me to thinking about the "REAL REASON" (beyond geo-political and archeo-scientific issues) why dudes like Saddam, Gaddafi or Chávez - who said once: "Only women have the passion and the love to make the revolution") had to die. Does the same fate awaits Assad in Syria (or should, like West planned)? Well I don't know... but when I read his words: "You cannot reform your society or institution without opening your mind" (+ links below about women's right in Assad's Syria), well... willy-nilly - I see kind of pattern. Do you? ;]-

Very interesting links - you should read it too:








At the end I strongly recommend this below documentary about female warrior of the Syrian Kurdish YPG (The People's Protection Units, or People's Defense Units. Kurdish: Yekîneyên Parastin Gel = YPG). Because as it was written, only Woman can defeated Evil:


Popularne posty z tego bloga

"Persian Mythology, Gods and Goddesses" (Part I)

"Ulecz się sam" - Andrzej Żak. Część II - Wolność jest jak zdrowie: uzyskuje wartość i stajemy się jej świadomi tylko wtedy, gdy ją tracimy...

Mitologia Indyjska: Mit o powstaniu świata, Bogini Matce i wojnie bogów!